Personally, when I hear about child soldiers, there's pity and anger. Pity to those innocent children who are being deployed to war and anger to those foolish people who uses children as combatants and human shield.
I pity the children because they are deprived of many rights. They have rights such as the right to education, the right to enjoy childhood and most importantly, they have the right to live freely. These child soldiers are used as military men and I just don't think it is right in any angle. They risk their lives to fight for what? I don't even think that most of them know what they are fighting for. As young as their minds, they are being brain washed to fight in wars and die,so they actually think it's normal. Unfortunate reality.
I am angry with the foolish and selfish people who uses children to achieve their interests. What then s the value of one life to them?
Sounds very emotional. During the talk about child soldiers, we were enlightened about its process and the actual role of these child soldiers. There are concepts that are to be understood to analyze more. Like the definition of Child. as for the Philippine Constitution, the age of the majority is at 18 but for the muslims, as a child reaches its puberty stage, he or she is already considered part of the age of the majority. This is how it differs in the perception and views of the government and the people.
One of the speakers shared his experience about his encounter of child soldiers during the Iraq war. He mentioned that it was hard for them to identify if the one they are shooting is a child or not due to the distance. Both difficult for the side of the innocent children and the one opposing them.
The talk was informal but informative specially with the local scenario discussed by one of the speakers. At the end of the day, these children have human rights to be respected.
Monday, September 6, 2010
Public Diplomacy Seminar
"Public Diplomacy: the strategic planning and execution of informational, cultural and educational programming by an advocate country to create a public opinion environment in a target country or countries that will enable target country political leaders to make decisions that are supportive of advocate country's foreign policy objectives." (http://www.publicdiplomacy.org/45.htm)
The aforementioned definition of public diplomacy seem to be complicated. Right? During the seminar on Public Diplomacy, we were enlightened by the personnal experiences of the speaker about public diplomacy. His talk was informal but very informative. One of the lines that struck me is that "The number one ambassador of your country is you". My classmates would agree with me with this. After what happened in the Manila hostage crisis, Filipinos all around the world are down and being discriminated by the different nationalities. But because of that certain line, at least those who are in the seminar are enlightened and the burdens were kind of lifted. After all, it is not the end the world. Maybe one of our fellow citizens have made this mistake and our authorities were not able to perform their duties well, it is not the end of the world. The young administration is faced with this big problem but if we will act as a nation and stop blaming another, we will be able to surpass this. I believe that once we are able to solve this issue with pride and dignity, our country will be strong enough to face any other challenges that involves this kind of issue.
I believe that as a country rich in resources and values that are liked by many, we are advantageous in public diplomacy. We have a lot to offer and be proud of. As the Department of Foreign Affairs and the Department of Tourism take the lead in making our country stand out using public diplomacy, we, the citizens of this country must also help them and take part in making things possible. We have to be proud of our country and help in promoting the country's bests. If this happens, surely the economy of the country through tourism will boost.
The aforementioned definition of public diplomacy seem to be complicated. Right? During the seminar on Public Diplomacy, we were enlightened by the personnal experiences of the speaker about public diplomacy. His talk was informal but very informative. One of the lines that struck me is that "The number one ambassador of your country is you". My classmates would agree with me with this. After what happened in the Manila hostage crisis, Filipinos all around the world are down and being discriminated by the different nationalities. But because of that certain line, at least those who are in the seminar are enlightened and the burdens were kind of lifted. After all, it is not the end the world. Maybe one of our fellow citizens have made this mistake and our authorities were not able to perform their duties well, it is not the end of the world. The young administration is faced with this big problem but if we will act as a nation and stop blaming another, we will be able to surpass this. I believe that once we are able to solve this issue with pride and dignity, our country will be strong enough to face any other challenges that involves this kind of issue.
I believe that as a country rich in resources and values that are liked by many, we are advantageous in public diplomacy. We have a lot to offer and be proud of. As the Department of Foreign Affairs and the Department of Tourism take the lead in making our country stand out using public diplomacy, we, the citizens of this country must also help them and take part in making things possible. We have to be proud of our country and help in promoting the country's bests. If this happens, surely the economy of the country through tourism will boost.
Arguments in the Visiting Forces Agreement
The Visiting Forces Agreement or the VFA of the Philippines and the United States is supposed to be an agreement to benefit both countries but ever since it was established, there are a lot of issues that are to be addressed for the side of the Philippines. In the article "What's wrong with the Visiting Forces Agreements", there were several point mentioned saying that this agreement is not fair and is considered a burden for the Philippines. This paper will counter these arguments by the advantages that the agreement brings to the Philippines.
Argument # 1:
"It is an affront to our (Philippine) constitution"
This argument in the article is being supported by an article in the constitution that said "The Philippines is consistent with the national interest, adopts and pursues a policy of freedom from nuclear weapons in its territory". The article is saying that this part of the constitution was reduced in the agreement for there is a lack of inspection form the side of the Philippine government when it comes to the nuclear-capable aircraft and naval vessel of the U.S when entering the territory of the Philippines.
The VFA will not require the military vessels in the exercises to be conducted here to carry nuclear weapons. Most of the exercises are conventional in nature and do not all involve training in biological, chemical, or even nuclear warfare. Conducting war games with US forces is important in upgrading the capabilities of Filipino soldiers in land, sea and air operations, which the Americans have perfected. War games, in fact, constitute a transfer of technology; and the Armed Forces of the Philippines can only benefit from the infusion of sophisticated military know-how from the troops of a country that just happens to be the planet's sole, undisputed superpower.
Argument # 2:
"It grants extraterritorial rights to Americans"
This argument is strongly supported by saying that the Philippines, as a sovereign country must have full jurisdiction for its territory but due to this agreement, this right was being reduced because Americans were given lenient rules in entering the country.
Maybe we should see it as a necessity to grants rights for the Americans in entering the country with more lenient rules but this does not mean that we are actually granting extraterritorial rights to them. It is part of making things easier for both sides. It is just that, the Philippine authority should make sure that the ones entering the country are really for the military service and will not go beyond what is stated in the agreement. Besides, the VFA would provide the guidelines for determining the legal status of American soldiers in the Philippines during joint military exercises provided under the RP-US Mutual Defense Treaty (MDT). Also, Philippine military personnel can travel to the US in emergency cases without passports or visas. While in the US, they will be allowed to import articles and send these back to the Philippines free of duties and taxes.
Argument # 3:
"It can involve us in unnecessary international conflicts"
Due to the "vagueness" of the agreement, specifically in the parts of America's activity in the Philippine territory, there is a possibility that the country could be involved in the international conflicts just because the Americans are staying here.
During the 9/11 attack, the Arroyo administration strongly supported the United States and the fight against international terrorism and offered that the Clark Air Field and Subic Bay Naval Base for use by the International Coalition Against Terrorism as transit points or staging areas for troops fighting the war against terrorism in Afghanistan. And in return, the Bush Administration promised President Arroyo that the United States would give the Philippines US$92.3 million in military equipment to bolster not only its ability to counter terrorism but also to increase its wherewithal to fight local insurgents. This is a clear manifestation that even though the agreement is supposed to be "vague", the Philippines still gets benefit from it to strengthen our own military.
Also, if the agreement is considered to be vague, what the government could have done is strengthen our national authorities in implementing the specific articles of the agreement. After all, even if this agreements give the Philippines benefits, it will always have its flaws.
As a Filipino I am actually more concerned with the Filipino citizens who are not aware of what this agreement could bring. I am fortunate enough to have a knowledge about this agreement but in reality, even if I know things about this, will I be able to do anything to stop or amend this if I have strong arguments on why to abolish this? Also, before anything is to be done, we have to consider the things that we will lose in case we drop this agreement. It would be a challenge for a new and young administration to drop this agreement and be able to stand on our own but if not today, when will we learn to be truly sovereign? I am not saying that having relationships with other countries is a negative thing, in fact we need it to survive in this century but before having bilateral or multilateral agreements, I believe that our officials must always take the interest of our country as a priority.
Argument # 1:
"It is an affront to our (Philippine) constitution"
This argument in the article is being supported by an article in the constitution that said "The Philippines is consistent with the national interest, adopts and pursues a policy of freedom from nuclear weapons in its territory". The article is saying that this part of the constitution was reduced in the agreement for there is a lack of inspection form the side of the Philippine government when it comes to the nuclear-capable aircraft and naval vessel of the U.S when entering the territory of the Philippines.
The VFA will not require the military vessels in the exercises to be conducted here to carry nuclear weapons. Most of the exercises are conventional in nature and do not all involve training in biological, chemical, or even nuclear warfare. Conducting war games with US forces is important in upgrading the capabilities of Filipino soldiers in land, sea and air operations, which the Americans have perfected. War games, in fact, constitute a transfer of technology; and the Armed Forces of the Philippines can only benefit from the infusion of sophisticated military know-how from the troops of a country that just happens to be the planet's sole, undisputed superpower.
Argument # 2:
"It grants extraterritorial rights to Americans"
This argument is strongly supported by saying that the Philippines, as a sovereign country must have full jurisdiction for its territory but due to this agreement, this right was being reduced because Americans were given lenient rules in entering the country.
Maybe we should see it as a necessity to grants rights for the Americans in entering the country with more lenient rules but this does not mean that we are actually granting extraterritorial rights to them. It is part of making things easier for both sides. It is just that, the Philippine authority should make sure that the ones entering the country are really for the military service and will not go beyond what is stated in the agreement. Besides, the VFA would provide the guidelines for determining the legal status of American soldiers in the Philippines during joint military exercises provided under the RP-US Mutual Defense Treaty (MDT). Also, Philippine military personnel can travel to the US in emergency cases without passports or visas. While in the US, they will be allowed to import articles and send these back to the Philippines free of duties and taxes.
Argument # 3:
"It can involve us in unnecessary international conflicts"
Due to the "vagueness" of the agreement, specifically in the parts of America's activity in the Philippine territory, there is a possibility that the country could be involved in the international conflicts just because the Americans are staying here.
During the 9/11 attack, the Arroyo administration strongly supported the United States and the fight against international terrorism and offered that the Clark Air Field and Subic Bay Naval Base for use by the International Coalition Against Terrorism as transit points or staging areas for troops fighting the war against terrorism in Afghanistan. And in return, the Bush Administration promised President Arroyo that the United States would give the Philippines US$92.3 million in military equipment to bolster not only its ability to counter terrorism but also to increase its wherewithal to fight local insurgents. This is a clear manifestation that even though the agreement is supposed to be "vague", the Philippines still gets benefit from it to strengthen our own military.
Also, if the agreement is considered to be vague, what the government could have done is strengthen our national authorities in implementing the specific articles of the agreement. After all, even if this agreements give the Philippines benefits, it will always have its flaws.
As a Filipino I am actually more concerned with the Filipino citizens who are not aware of what this agreement could bring. I am fortunate enough to have a knowledge about this agreement but in reality, even if I know things about this, will I be able to do anything to stop or amend this if I have strong arguments on why to abolish this? Also, before anything is to be done, we have to consider the things that we will lose in case we drop this agreement. It would be a challenge for a new and young administration to drop this agreement and be able to stand on our own but if not today, when will we learn to be truly sovereign? I am not saying that having relationships with other countries is a negative thing, in fact we need it to survive in this century but before having bilateral or multilateral agreements, I believe that our officials must always take the interest of our country as a priority.
Sunday, September 5, 2010
Group Work || OFWs in ASEAN Countries
For how many decades now, the Philippines has been sending nationals to the different parts of the world as human capital or as Overseas Filipino Workers. According to the Labor Code Provisions on Overseas employment, workers are those members of the labor force employed of unemployed. Any citizen then that is considered in the definition can be considered an OFW whether or not the purpose of migration is for work or not. It is the responsibility of the government to protect its nationals wherever they may be in the world. Protection of Nationals will be efficient only if the laws are enacted well from the very start of the process, before even one can go out of the country. The formulation of the group’s foreign policy however, will only focus on implementation of laws and protection of nationals in countries which are member states of the ASEAN.
Philippines is one of the pioneer countries in the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) together with Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. As of today, Brunei, Myanmar, Cambodia, Lao DPR and Vietnam are already part of ASEAN. The organization aims to promote economic integration, social progress and cultural development within the member states. In general, the ASEAN aims to promote peace and stability within the region.
Considering the aims of the regional group, the Philippines is expected to have a good relationship with the member states of ASEAN and vice-versa. The friendly relations should then cover the respect for domestic laws of each country especially on overseas employment. Major questions would be: Are Philippine laws when it comes to overseas hiring/recruitment properly implemented? Are countries in ASEAN aware of the laws? Are the embassies in the countries of ASEAN able to trace violations of Philippine laws when it comes to labor employment? Article 18 of Philippines’ Labor Code says that “No employer may hire a Filipino worker for overseas employment except through the Boards and entities authorized by the Secretary of Labor. Direct-hiring by members of the diplomatic corps, international organizations and such other employers as may be allowed by the Secretary of Labor is exempted from this provision.” However, according to research, in general, this hiring law would not work due to several reasons. One major consideration would be, Filipinos do not need visas (good for two weeks) in able to visit countries in the ASEAN as it is part of an agreement. How then will the government know the genuine purpose of one in visiting a country in ASEAN? Will they automatically know of a person has extended his/her stay? Giving a concrete situation: When a Filipino “tourist” visits an ASEAN country and decides to work there after a company offers a good salary; will the Philippine government know that such thing happened and it is considered direct hiring? The main rationale of Article 18 says that “direct hiring affords no protection to OFWs – there is no joint and solitary liability between the recruitment agency and the employer, no POEA-approved contract containing the required minimum standards, and there was no bond posted by a recruitment agency.”
Due to issues on laws that are supposed to be properly and strictly implemented and the danger it gives to our nationals, the group has decided to have this foreign policy:
“Labor Code Provisions on Overseas Employment specifically Article 18 will be given emphasis to help the government protect Philippine nationals from further crimes and human rights violation.”
Philippines is one of the pioneer countries in the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) together with Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand. As of today, Brunei, Myanmar, Cambodia, Lao DPR and Vietnam are already part of ASEAN. The organization aims to promote economic integration, social progress and cultural development within the member states. In general, the ASEAN aims to promote peace and stability within the region.
Considering the aims of the regional group, the Philippines is expected to have a good relationship with the member states of ASEAN and vice-versa. The friendly relations should then cover the respect for domestic laws of each country especially on overseas employment. Major questions would be: Are Philippine laws when it comes to overseas hiring/recruitment properly implemented? Are countries in ASEAN aware of the laws? Are the embassies in the countries of ASEAN able to trace violations of Philippine laws when it comes to labor employment? Article 18 of Philippines’ Labor Code says that “No employer may hire a Filipino worker for overseas employment except through the Boards and entities authorized by the Secretary of Labor. Direct-hiring by members of the diplomatic corps, international organizations and such other employers as may be allowed by the Secretary of Labor is exempted from this provision.” However, according to research, in general, this hiring law would not work due to several reasons. One major consideration would be, Filipinos do not need visas (good for two weeks) in able to visit countries in the ASEAN as it is part of an agreement. How then will the government know the genuine purpose of one in visiting a country in ASEAN? Will they automatically know of a person has extended his/her stay? Giving a concrete situation: When a Filipino “tourist” visits an ASEAN country and decides to work there after a company offers a good salary; will the Philippine government know that such thing happened and it is considered direct hiring? The main rationale of Article 18 says that “direct hiring affords no protection to OFWs – there is no joint and solitary liability between the recruitment agency and the employer, no POEA-approved contract containing the required minimum standards, and there was no bond posted by a recruitment agency.”
Due to issues on laws that are supposed to be properly and strictly implemented and the danger it gives to our nationals, the group has decided to have this foreign policy:
“Labor Code Provisions on Overseas Employment specifically Article 18 will be given emphasis to help the government protect Philippine nationals from further crimes and human rights violation.”
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Hostage Taking involving Foreign Nationals
It was a nightmare for the Philippines. The hostage taking and the bloodshed was no one’s wish but it happened. “Why of all the buses in Manila, a foreign one?” was my initial question but as the day of the hostage taking went along, hundreds of questions flood my mind. “Surely, our relations with the international community will be affected specially with China and the Hong Kong”, I concluded after all the things that happened during that day. True enough, I’ve read so many articles with different opinions and sentiments from different people around the globe. A lot criticizes the actions of the authorities regarding the matter and it all boils down to blaming the government, the administration. Fortunately, some tries to understand and not blame but instead, suggests working together for a faster justice.
After the incident, there have been a lot of decisions from both countries. Hong Kong has declared Philippines as part of the blacklisted countries. Yes, they reserve all the rights to do so to help protect their citizens. Surely, this decision will affect the country’s tourism. Many have cancelled flights to the Philippines. Also, there were news that Filipino citizens in Hong Kong are being maltreated and discriminated although there are no official report yet. Personally, I try to understand the Hong Kong nationals, they are emotional and sympathetic about what happened but I plead that they must also realize that the Filipinos in their country and in the rest of the world is not Mendoza, they did not kill not hurt anyone from the country where they are staying then they don’t deserve to be treated as such. With all these, a high delegation was set to go to Hong Kong to explain the incident to the officials of the foreign country but weren’t able to push through since Hong Kong wanted a result once they officially meet. Seeing all these, it will not be easy for the Philippines to neutralize relations with Hong Kong. But our president never loses hope as he said in his speech “Given enough time we can recover”.
I have been reading comments in the articles related to the issue. The comments of our very own citizens break my heart. It seems that we are not working as one nation in here but instead we blame others to be responsible for this incident. Some Filipinos blame the government, some curses the foreign nationals. Most probably, these citizens of the Philippines are not aware of the possible effects of what happened. Maybe they are not aware that breaking our good relations with a foreign country such as Hong Kong and China will affect our economy. I pity our young administration for many are blaming them. I agree that they should have taken part of the responsibility during the day of the hostage taking but not alone in this.
After the Flor Contemplacion case, this one’s the next well-known tragedy that involves the Philippines. If not because of media, this will not be as this big issue. Let’s admit it, from all around the world, there are a lot of foreign nationals being killed and are deprived of justice but getting this much attention from everybody is not the real trend. Media has played a big part in the hostage taking. I just hope that since they were able to show the world what happened during the tragedy, they will also be able to emphasize the actions of the authorities to resolve this problem.
Damage has been done to the relations of the Philippines with the foreign countries. I believe that what we can do now is help each other not blame. I hope our government is doing their best in the investigation to resolve this problem and give justice to all those who died. Let us stop giving so much attention to the little things like PNoy’s smiles during the incident. We have to be more mature in this issue and focus on the things that has to be done to bring back our good relations with the foreign country and continue praying for the souls of those who died.
After the incident, there have been a lot of decisions from both countries. Hong Kong has declared Philippines as part of the blacklisted countries. Yes, they reserve all the rights to do so to help protect their citizens. Surely, this decision will affect the country’s tourism. Many have cancelled flights to the Philippines. Also, there were news that Filipino citizens in Hong Kong are being maltreated and discriminated although there are no official report yet. Personally, I try to understand the Hong Kong nationals, they are emotional and sympathetic about what happened but I plead that they must also realize that the Filipinos in their country and in the rest of the world is not Mendoza, they did not kill not hurt anyone from the country where they are staying then they don’t deserve to be treated as such. With all these, a high delegation was set to go to Hong Kong to explain the incident to the officials of the foreign country but weren’t able to push through since Hong Kong wanted a result once they officially meet. Seeing all these, it will not be easy for the Philippines to neutralize relations with Hong Kong. But our president never loses hope as he said in his speech “Given enough time we can recover”.
I have been reading comments in the articles related to the issue. The comments of our very own citizens break my heart. It seems that we are not working as one nation in here but instead we blame others to be responsible for this incident. Some Filipinos blame the government, some curses the foreign nationals. Most probably, these citizens of the Philippines are not aware of the possible effects of what happened. Maybe they are not aware that breaking our good relations with a foreign country such as Hong Kong and China will affect our economy. I pity our young administration for many are blaming them. I agree that they should have taken part of the responsibility during the day of the hostage taking but not alone in this.
After the Flor Contemplacion case, this one’s the next well-known tragedy that involves the Philippines. If not because of media, this will not be as this big issue. Let’s admit it, from all around the world, there are a lot of foreign nationals being killed and are deprived of justice but getting this much attention from everybody is not the real trend. Media has played a big part in the hostage taking. I just hope that since they were able to show the world what happened during the tragedy, they will also be able to emphasize the actions of the authorities to resolve this problem.
Damage has been done to the relations of the Philippines with the foreign countries. I believe that what we can do now is help each other not blame. I hope our government is doing their best in the investigation to resolve this problem and give justice to all those who died. Let us stop giving so much attention to the little things like PNoy’s smiles during the incident. We have to be more mature in this issue and focus on the things that has to be done to bring back our good relations with the foreign country and continue praying for the souls of those who died.
Monday, August 16, 2010
August 16 || Philippine Foreign Policy
"Another boring meeting". The session started with this statement from our very own professor. Ironically, this statement made the discussion more interesting for me. I was absent last meeting and fortunately, we had a recap of last week's discussion, the relations of the Philippines with U.S, China and Japan.
For this session, we talked about the major concern of the Philippine Foreign Policy. Alarmingly, we have several major concerns that I think the government must address effectively. First, on the regional arrangements and multilateral organizations. Our government, as expected must promote the national interest in the regional arrangements through development diplomacy. I have been hearing this kind of diplomacy in my other subjects but it is never clear what it means except that it is used to specific areas. In the case of the first concern, development diplomacy is used through trade, investment and technology transfer of course in cooperation with the different international organizations. I've read some articles about Trans-pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP). This was mentioned by our professor. This is interesting for me as it is a trade agreement between countries from the different sides of the world.
As our discussion has pointed out, the Philippines' involvement in the the international organizations are sometimes questionable. For example, we support peacekeeping operations of the UN in war-torn areas considering that we have our own "situations" or internal issues. This point leads me to this question: What are our priorities?
I find it important as well that we do not forget the marginalized part of the society such as children and women because for me, who else is going to care for these sectors?
The next part of the discussion is about the territorial rights. I agree with our professor saying that this concern is actually answerable by our constitution. Whatever is written there is the basis of our claims. However, we must always consider that other countries would also have their constitution that could be way different from ours causing disputes among countries, damaging their relations.
Lastly, we tackled direct foreign investments. Again, development diplomacy was mentioned in this part of the discussion pointing out that Europe along with U.S, China, Japan and ASEAN (which includes the Philippines) and these countries could be sources of direct investment, technology transfer and trade. At this point, tourism is considered the main thrust of Philippine Foreign Policy. Honestly, I believe that only if our tourism is well taken care of, it would help our economy so much. After all, our country has a lot of tourist spots.
Our OWFs are important as much as all the above mentioned. As our nationals are scattered in the different parts of the world working and remitting money to our country helping our economy, the more that the government should be keen enough to protect them.
It is a great challenge for this administration to address all the major concerns mentioned above. But, as Filipino citizens of this country, we must not forget that we have our responsibilities too.
For this session, we talked about the major concern of the Philippine Foreign Policy. Alarmingly, we have several major concerns that I think the government must address effectively. First, on the regional arrangements and multilateral organizations. Our government, as expected must promote the national interest in the regional arrangements through development diplomacy. I have been hearing this kind of diplomacy in my other subjects but it is never clear what it means except that it is used to specific areas. In the case of the first concern, development diplomacy is used through trade, investment and technology transfer of course in cooperation with the different international organizations. I've read some articles about Trans-pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP). This was mentioned by our professor. This is interesting for me as it is a trade agreement between countries from the different sides of the world.
As our discussion has pointed out, the Philippines' involvement in the the international organizations are sometimes questionable. For example, we support peacekeeping operations of the UN in war-torn areas considering that we have our own "situations" or internal issues. This point leads me to this question: What are our priorities?
I find it important as well that we do not forget the marginalized part of the society such as children and women because for me, who else is going to care for these sectors?
The next part of the discussion is about the territorial rights. I agree with our professor saying that this concern is actually answerable by our constitution. Whatever is written there is the basis of our claims. However, we must always consider that other countries would also have their constitution that could be way different from ours causing disputes among countries, damaging their relations.
Lastly, we tackled direct foreign investments. Again, development diplomacy was mentioned in this part of the discussion pointing out that Europe along with U.S, China, Japan and ASEAN (which includes the Philippines) and these countries could be sources of direct investment, technology transfer and trade. At this point, tourism is considered the main thrust of Philippine Foreign Policy. Honestly, I believe that only if our tourism is well taken care of, it would help our economy so much. After all, our country has a lot of tourist spots.
Our OWFs are important as much as all the above mentioned. As our nationals are scattered in the different parts of the world working and remitting money to our country helping our economy, the more that the government should be keen enough to protect them.
It is a great challenge for this administration to address all the major concerns mentioned above. But, as Filipino citizens of this country, we must not forget that we have our responsibilities too.
Sunday, August 15, 2010
On PNoy's Speech (ASEAN)
"Philippine foreign policy decisions have to be made in the context of ASEAN"
ASEAN is part of the 8 Philippine foreign policy realities, it is that important to our country. President Noy's statement about his plans for the organization then has a big impact on our country's future, if it will be implemented.
The president's speech about ASEAN is very general. He stated things about the importance of our country's relationship with the international community specifically when it comes to the economic aspect as he mentioned investments in the first part of his speech. He mentioned general benefits of having good relations with other countries.
As of action plan during his term, he mentioned about being a "good neighbor, a productive partner and a consensus-builder." All of these are very general. He did not define what a good neighbor or productive partner is meaning there are actually no concrete plans in his speech.
For me, it is good that he has mentioned of the transition in ASEAN. It makes us realize that the ASEAN responsibility today is different from before. Therefore a new challenge. Today's responsibility demands a lot of negotiations and proper implementation.
It is also important that he reiterated the goal of ASEAN by 2015. At least the direction of ASEAN is clear for this administration. He mentioned plans about the three key pillars but then again it was very general. There were no specific or concrete plans mentioned except for the translation of the ASEAN charter to Filipino and disseminating it to the schools. Although this is one way to make the Filipino citizens aware of our Philippine relations, I don't see this step as a priority. Although very general, I think it is important that he has plans for each of the pillar.
To conclude the speech, I can say that this is actually a dream. It is full of promises and good things. It seems like the Philippines will not have a hard time dealing with ASEAN and its goals. Yes, this is very ideal and optimistic, it is just that he was not able to mention the possible considerations and the concrete plans to achieve the goals.
ASEAN is part of the 8 Philippine foreign policy realities, it is that important to our country. President Noy's statement about his plans for the organization then has a big impact on our country's future, if it will be implemented.
The president's speech about ASEAN is very general. He stated things about the importance of our country's relationship with the international community specifically when it comes to the economic aspect as he mentioned investments in the first part of his speech. He mentioned general benefits of having good relations with other countries.
As of action plan during his term, he mentioned about being a "good neighbor, a productive partner and a consensus-builder." All of these are very general. He did not define what a good neighbor or productive partner is meaning there are actually no concrete plans in his speech.
For me, it is good that he has mentioned of the transition in ASEAN. It makes us realize that the ASEAN responsibility today is different from before. Therefore a new challenge. Today's responsibility demands a lot of negotiations and proper implementation.
It is also important that he reiterated the goal of ASEAN by 2015. At least the direction of ASEAN is clear for this administration. He mentioned plans about the three key pillars but then again it was very general. There were no specific or concrete plans mentioned except for the translation of the ASEAN charter to Filipino and disseminating it to the schools. Although this is one way to make the Filipino citizens aware of our Philippine relations, I don't see this step as a priority. Although very general, I think it is important that he has plans for each of the pillar.
To conclude the speech, I can say that this is actually a dream. It is full of promises and good things. It seems like the Philippines will not have a hard time dealing with ASEAN and its goals. Yes, this is very ideal and optimistic, it is just that he was not able to mention the possible considerations and the concrete plans to achieve the goals.
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
August 02 || The Visiting Forces Agreement
After talking about Pnoy's State of the Nation Address during the previous meeting, the class went on to discuss an important "treaty" that involves the Philippines and the United States. First, it was a fun challenge for me to read a 4-paged article about the visiting forces agreement or the VFA. Given a limited time of 10 minutes made me think and analyze things faster.;) The article that I got highlighted the flaws of the said agreement. It highlighted three main arguments which are very detrimental to the our national interest.
After reading the article given, the class discussion started with a question of "What then is VFA?". From my side, there was an outpouring number of negative definition and on the other side were the positive ones. I was expecting a little debate over the question but it seems that the other side of the class agrees with our definitions. VFA is indeed an agreement that allows the US to exploit our country and our citizens, at least for my interpretation. As the discussion went on, I've learned about the history of the agreement and the processes done before it was actually considered a "treaty" for the Philippines. It was of great disappointment actually for me to know that our public officials specifically the ones assigned to represent our country allowed such agreement to be enacted or implemented. As how I see it, it is totally pointless. I'm not saying that we should benefit more but I'm more of making it equal in terms of opportunities and benefits. As mentioned several times in the class discussion, in treaties, both parties should be equal. Reading the short article influenced me and convinced me that this agreement should not be honored and implemented in the country unless we decide to surrender ourselves to the Americans and become their slaves not remembering the struggle our nation had to go through to have independence. Not so perfect, right?
As for the powerpoint presentation, it consisted more of VFAs flaws than merits making it more difficult for our side to counter the arguments given in the article which is anti-VFA. Also, I have one pretty question. Is there really VFA I and II because it was mentioned in the discussion but was not tackled in detail.
That's it for this week's meeting. The meetings after midterms seem to be more interesting and enjoyable. :>
After reading the article given, the class discussion started with a question of "What then is VFA?". From my side, there was an outpouring number of negative definition and on the other side were the positive ones. I was expecting a little debate over the question but it seems that the other side of the class agrees with our definitions. VFA is indeed an agreement that allows the US to exploit our country and our citizens, at least for my interpretation. As the discussion went on, I've learned about the history of the agreement and the processes done before it was actually considered a "treaty" for the Philippines. It was of great disappointment actually for me to know that our public officials specifically the ones assigned to represent our country allowed such agreement to be enacted or implemented. As how I see it, it is totally pointless. I'm not saying that we should benefit more but I'm more of making it equal in terms of opportunities and benefits. As mentioned several times in the class discussion, in treaties, both parties should be equal. Reading the short article influenced me and convinced me that this agreement should not be honored and implemented in the country unless we decide to surrender ourselves to the Americans and become their slaves not remembering the struggle our nation had to go through to have independence. Not so perfect, right?
As for the powerpoint presentation, it consisted more of VFAs flaws than merits making it more difficult for our side to counter the arguments given in the article which is anti-VFA. Also, I have one pretty question. Is there really VFA I and II because it was mentioned in the discussion but was not tackled in detail.
That's it for this week's meeting. The meetings after midterms seem to be more interesting and enjoyable. :>
Sunday, August 1, 2010
July 26 || Evaluating PNoy's SONA
I think that taking this subject during this term is perfect! One of the reasons why I am enjoying this subject is because we are updated with the events of our country and we get to evaluate and critic it. Evaluating the things happening to predict and plan for the future. Sounds great right? Just perfect in time after the elections, the new administration is presenting the policies to be implemented.
The entire class period focused on President Aquino's State of the Nation Address or SONA. Unfortunately, I was not able to watch it due to a meeting set on that exact time although I was able to get a copy of his speech. Well enough. Before the discussion, I find his SONA just enough and good to have a grade of 9/10 but as our discussion went on in class, the grade went lower maybe because of the influence of my classmates' opinion and maybe because I was able to have a deeper understanding of what he was actually saying when we started discussing it in class.
The group activity made me have an in depth understanding at least about a certain issue discussed in the SONA. Since the subject is about foreign policy and the SONA did not mention any direct plans for foreign policies, it was a great experience that we were able to relate the domestic policies to possible foreign policies or relations. The Philippines' has been dealing with economic problems (well mentioned during the SONA with specific realities) and his speech mentioned solutions to the problems. Our group has decided to present it in a flowchart beginning with the "Economic Problem" and ending with the "Economic Progress".
It was a helpful exercise for us CDA students.
The entire class period focused on President Aquino's State of the Nation Address or SONA. Unfortunately, I was not able to watch it due to a meeting set on that exact time although I was able to get a copy of his speech. Well enough. Before the discussion, I find his SONA just enough and good to have a grade of 9/10 but as our discussion went on in class, the grade went lower maybe because of the influence of my classmates' opinion and maybe because I was able to have a deeper understanding of what he was actually saying when we started discussing it in class.
The group activity made me have an in depth understanding at least about a certain issue discussed in the SONA. Since the subject is about foreign policy and the SONA did not mention any direct plans for foreign policies, it was a great experience that we were able to relate the domestic policies to possible foreign policies or relations. The Philippines' has been dealing with economic problems (well mentioned during the SONA with specific realities) and his speech mentioned solutions to the problems. Our group has decided to present it in a flowchart beginning with the "Economic Problem" and ending with the "Economic Progress".
It was a helpful exercise for us CDA students.
July 19 || Peace Process
The week after midterms! Miss was just so great that she let us have at least half of the time as our free time after the midterms week. Exhaustive!
Even if the meeting was short, still, the short discussion on peace process made us interested to listed even if we were all tired. The peace process is one of the topics for the midterms. It was never an interest of mine until this meeting. It was so frustrating that the PGMA administration was not able to settle anything after a long time. It was interesting to know facts about this issue like the involvement of the different countries and organizations. It is interesting and frustrating at the same time to know that Malaysia as the mediator did not help at all in the peace process due to its national interest. Why of all countries, Malaysia! I strongly believe that Malaysia has to be replaced as aligned with PNoy's plan regarding the peace process.
It was not a heavy discussion but an interesting one. Rest assured, I'll start reading articles and start updating myself with the progress of the peace process.
Even if the meeting was short, still, the short discussion on peace process made us interested to listed even if we were all tired. The peace process is one of the topics for the midterms. It was never an interest of mine until this meeting. It was so frustrating that the PGMA administration was not able to settle anything after a long time. It was interesting to know facts about this issue like the involvement of the different countries and organizations. It is interesting and frustrating at the same time to know that Malaysia as the mediator did not help at all in the peace process due to its national interest. Why of all countries, Malaysia! I strongly believe that Malaysia has to be replaced as aligned with PNoy's plan regarding the peace process.
It was not a heavy discussion but an interesting one. Rest assured, I'll start reading articles and start updating myself with the progress of the peace process.
July 12 || Formulation of Policies
So far, I find this meeting the most interesting, formulating policies.
The class started with the brief discussion of the Philippines' history, culture and tradition. It made me realize that these are actually part of the factors that we consider in formulating our domestic and foreign policies.
Foreign policy is considered to be the extension of ones domestic policy. The formulation and the implementation of these policies then depend on the different institutions such as the Department of Foreign Affairs, the Department of Labor and Employment and the different interest groups. The class was then reminded of the 3 elements of foreign policies: the national interest or territorial integrity, economic progress and protection of nationals.
The most interesting part of the meeting was the discussion of the foreign policy process. This is something that I find so real and must be studied seriously considering that this will be our future job, hopefully. :) It was a nice learning experience to have tried formulating a policy with my group mates. It made us think critically and have fun at the same time. It's just that, the deadline for the paper is the same date as our midterms causing our attention to be divided.
I am looking forward to having activities such as this :)
The class started with the brief discussion of the Philippines' history, culture and tradition. It made me realize that these are actually part of the factors that we consider in formulating our domestic and foreign policies.
Foreign policy is considered to be the extension of ones domestic policy. The formulation and the implementation of these policies then depend on the different institutions such as the Department of Foreign Affairs, the Department of Labor and Employment and the different interest groups. The class was then reminded of the 3 elements of foreign policies: the national interest or territorial integrity, economic progress and protection of nationals.
The most interesting part of the meeting was the discussion of the foreign policy process. This is something that I find so real and must be studied seriously considering that this will be our future job, hopefully. :) It was a nice learning experience to have tried formulating a policy with my group mates. It made us think critically and have fun at the same time. It's just that, the deadline for the paper is the same date as our midterms causing our attention to be divided.
I am looking forward to having activities such as this :)
Thursday, July 22, 2010
MIdterm Exam || Protection of Nationals
Protection of Nationals
Foreign policy is considered the extension of a country’s domestic policy. Three elements are most important in formulating such policies: Preservation and enhancement of national security, Promotion and attainment of economic security and Protection of the rights and promotion of the welfare and interest of Filipinos overseas.
A country with a government is useless if there are no people to govern in the first place. Nationals of the country play a vital role as much as the government does. Protection of nationals then is a major responsibility of the government and this topic will be the focus of this paper. The responsibility covers not only the nationals inside the country but most importantly, the ones that reside in the different parts of the world. Different institutions and departments work together to implement policies to protect Filipino nationals. The Department of Foreign Affairs, given the mandate to implement the foreign policies has the greatest responsibility over our nationals outside the country. According to Article 3, 1b of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, it is the task of the diplomatic mission to “protect in the receiving State the interests of the sending State and of its nationals, within the limits permitted by international law”
The Philippines has been sending nationals to the different parts of the world. The nationals themselves decide to migrate mostly for the reason of seeking for greener pastures and some for personal and other reasons. For the past decades since migration started, several cases of human rights violation and crimes involving Filipino nationals have been recorded. There are cases which got the attention of the media and made the Filipino people aware. Many Filipinos have been sentenced to death or have been given a life sentence. Unfortunately, some were not even reported and therefore not recorded. As these events happen, where is the government? Where are our embassies and representatives to take care of our Filipino nationals? It is not to say that they are not doing anything but maybe what they are not doing is not enough or our policies are too weak to protect our nationals. The fault could not be limited to the Philippines’ government or representatives but also to countries where our nationals are being deployed. Also, the policies of ours could conflict the policies of other countries.
Human rights violation has been an issue to begin with. Many Filipinos were sentenced to death and up to this day, many overseas Filipinos are in dire need of assistance from our ambassadors and consuls. In the Philippine history, the 1995 case of Flor Contemplacion opened the eyes and hearts of the Filipino people. The ability and credibility of the government with the Department of Foreign Affairs was tested in this case. During Flor’s imprisonment, it is said that the Philippine embassy officials visited her 9 times which can be considered few as of the total time she was imprisoned. The Philippine president during that time (Pres. Ramos) appealed a number of times to the Singaporean government to stay the execution. Stay meaning have a reinvestigation of the case. But in the end, Flor Contemplacion was hung and this event affected the relationship of Philippines to Singapore. Philippine ambassador to Singapore had been recalled and vice-versa. Singaporean flag was burnt in Manila by private citizens.
Who can we blame in this case? Are our officials responsible for the death sentence of Flor? Is there a possibility that this event could have not been pursued? 15 years after the death sentence, Filipinos will still have different point of views in this matter. Some would say that the government had done its part but most would say that they did not and could have done something to stop the execution. This is just one case where the credibility of the government and DFA had been tested when it comes to protecting our nationals.
As of what happened in the case of Flor Contemplacion, Philippine relations with Singapore was affected. As our government protects the nationals, they put in risk the relationship of the Philippines with other countries. One concrete example is the incident of Angelo Dela Cruz, a truck driver in Iraq last 2004. He was threatened to be killed by Iraqi insurgents. The only way he can be released is to pull out Filipino troops in Iraq. To save Angelo Dela Cruz, the Philippine government pulled the Philippine troops and he was able to return home safe. By this act of the government, the Americans were disappointed and the relationship of Philippines was affected as well. The American government points out that by doing such acts, the Philippines tolerated the act of “terrorists”.
The above mentioned cases tested our government and DFA as they decide over the protection of our nationals outside the country. The acts of our officials had a basis and it is our foreign policy. The results and consequences depend on the acts made by them. Our foreign policy then speaks a lot as its strength gives life to our nationals. Laws for our overseas Filipinos exist and must be implemented to protect the welfare of our nationals. After the Flor Contemplacion case, Migrant Workers Act of 1995 was made to protect our overseas Filipino workers. Its provisions focus on the process of deployment, illegal recruitment, services, government agencies, legal assistance for migrant worker affairs, the country-team approach, deregulation and phase out, professional and other highly skilled Filipinos and miscellaneous. Such laws guide our officials as they implement and strengthen policies to protect our nationals. If only, the above mentioned provisions are given enough attention and properly implemented, protecting our nationals outside the country would be easier.
In the deployment process, it is stated in Article 1 sec. 4 that “The State shall deploy overseas Filipino workers only in countries where the rights of Filipino migrant workers are protected.” This provision makes sense although it is vague. Although the Philippines has recognized countries that protect the rights of the Filipino, check and balance must be done after they have been deployed. Like what is happening in many countries now, Filipinos are being abused. So, is this still part of respecting their rights?
Fifteen years after the act was made, illegal recruitment stays a problem in the Philippines. Filipinos still entertain illegal recruitment even though it is known to be prohibited. Illegal recruitment is defined as “any act of canvassing, enlisting, contracting, transporting, utilizing, hiring, procuring workers and includes referring, contact services, promising or advertising for employment abroad, whether for profit or not, when undertaken by a non-license or non-holder of authority contemplated under Article 13(f) of Presidential Decree No. 442, as amended, otherwise known as the Labor Code of the Philippines.” Cases of illegal recruitment are obvious in the Philippines. Departments and Institutions are aware that such exist and it is their responsibility to combat any group that will try to violate the Philippine law. Although there are several cases in which the government was able to combat some, many still exist in every part of the country. If one citizen is illegally recruited, his or her documents are not filed in the records of the Department of Foreign Affairs therefore limiting the capacity of the department to protect the citizen. If a crime arises and a citizen does not have a file to become one of the bases, the government still is responsible in protecting them, not the illegal group that hired them. To avoid such incidents, the government should be keen in combating these illegal groups that put out citizens’ life into danger just to gain profit. They should be heavily penalized in able for them to learn and be an example for those who attempt to do illegal recruitment. Also, those entertaining illegal recruitment must be penalized. After all, if they will not entertain the crime, no one will offer it.
The labour code has reiterated the government agencies that will help in implementing the laws. First is the Department of Foreign Affairs which “shall take priority action its home office or foreign posts, shall take priority action or make representation with the foreign authority concerned to protect the rights of migrant workers and other overseas Filipinos and extend immediate assistance including the repatriation of distressed or beleaguered migrant workers and other overseas Filipinos” Next is the Department of Labour and employment which “shall see to it that labor and social welfare laws in the foreign countries are fairly applied to migrant workers and whenever applicable, to other overseas Filipinos including the grant of legal assistance and the referral to proper medical centers or hospitals” If these responsibilities are properly addressed to, the protection of Filipino nationals would be efficient.
One of the most important provisions in the labor code is the legal assistance for migrant workers affairs. It is “primarily responsible for the provision and overall coordination of all legal assistance services to be provided to Filipino migrant workers as well as overseas Filipinos in distress” This part of the provision makes our embassies responsible for the many cases of human rights violation and crimes to our Filipino workers. This counsel is the shoulder of our fellow Filipino in the different parts of the world.
The country-team approach states that “representatives and personnel of the Philippine government posted abroad regardless of their mother agencies shall, on a per country basis, act as one country-team with a mission under the leadership of the ambassador” In case of crimes and issues involving Filipino citizens in foreign countries, this rule shall take place. This provision makes it easier to protect our nationals.
Philippine Foreign Policy should be provided together with proper implementation. Outside the country, our Filipino nationals or citizens could only seek help and assistance in the embassies and consulates. Other than that, who will they run to in times of problem or abuse? One important consideration also is the process of migration. If violations are made even before one leaves the country, the possibility of human rights violation and abuse is widen. Illegal recruitment opens the door for abusive employers and it limits the capacity of our government to protect our nationals. After all, our nationals from outside the country remit money that boosts up our Philippine economy. For so long they have been the heroes of our country. As they migrate and work, they risk their lives. To protect them wherever they go is not just a responsibility but serves as a gratitude to them. Without them, our economy could have been dead now. Again, a government without its people is nothing. A government is made to and for the people, specifically in the Philippine set up as republic-democratic country. Protection of nationals is stated in the constitution of the Philippines therefore must be given utmost importance. Yes, the government has a great responsibility when it comes to its nationals. It is never an easy responsibility for every decision will have an effect not just inside the country but the globalize community outside. A lot of factors are to be considered before making a decision. Protection of nationals is vital but national and economic security matter as well.
Foreign policy is considered the extension of a country’s domestic policy. Three elements are most important in formulating such policies: Preservation and enhancement of national security, Promotion and attainment of economic security and Protection of the rights and promotion of the welfare and interest of Filipinos overseas.
A country with a government is useless if there are no people to govern in the first place. Nationals of the country play a vital role as much as the government does. Protection of nationals then is a major responsibility of the government and this topic will be the focus of this paper. The responsibility covers not only the nationals inside the country but most importantly, the ones that reside in the different parts of the world. Different institutions and departments work together to implement policies to protect Filipino nationals. The Department of Foreign Affairs, given the mandate to implement the foreign policies has the greatest responsibility over our nationals outside the country. According to Article 3, 1b of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, it is the task of the diplomatic mission to “protect in the receiving State the interests of the sending State and of its nationals, within the limits permitted by international law”
The Philippines has been sending nationals to the different parts of the world. The nationals themselves decide to migrate mostly for the reason of seeking for greener pastures and some for personal and other reasons. For the past decades since migration started, several cases of human rights violation and crimes involving Filipino nationals have been recorded. There are cases which got the attention of the media and made the Filipino people aware. Many Filipinos have been sentenced to death or have been given a life sentence. Unfortunately, some were not even reported and therefore not recorded. As these events happen, where is the government? Where are our embassies and representatives to take care of our Filipino nationals? It is not to say that they are not doing anything but maybe what they are not doing is not enough or our policies are too weak to protect our nationals. The fault could not be limited to the Philippines’ government or representatives but also to countries where our nationals are being deployed. Also, the policies of ours could conflict the policies of other countries.
Human rights violation has been an issue to begin with. Many Filipinos were sentenced to death and up to this day, many overseas Filipinos are in dire need of assistance from our ambassadors and consuls. In the Philippine history, the 1995 case of Flor Contemplacion opened the eyes and hearts of the Filipino people. The ability and credibility of the government with the Department of Foreign Affairs was tested in this case. During Flor’s imprisonment, it is said that the Philippine embassy officials visited her 9 times which can be considered few as of the total time she was imprisoned. The Philippine president during that time (Pres. Ramos) appealed a number of times to the Singaporean government to stay the execution. Stay meaning have a reinvestigation of the case. But in the end, Flor Contemplacion was hung and this event affected the relationship of Philippines to Singapore. Philippine ambassador to Singapore had been recalled and vice-versa. Singaporean flag was burnt in Manila by private citizens.
Who can we blame in this case? Are our officials responsible for the death sentence of Flor? Is there a possibility that this event could have not been pursued? 15 years after the death sentence, Filipinos will still have different point of views in this matter. Some would say that the government had done its part but most would say that they did not and could have done something to stop the execution. This is just one case where the credibility of the government and DFA had been tested when it comes to protecting our nationals.
As of what happened in the case of Flor Contemplacion, Philippine relations with Singapore was affected. As our government protects the nationals, they put in risk the relationship of the Philippines with other countries. One concrete example is the incident of Angelo Dela Cruz, a truck driver in Iraq last 2004. He was threatened to be killed by Iraqi insurgents. The only way he can be released is to pull out Filipino troops in Iraq. To save Angelo Dela Cruz, the Philippine government pulled the Philippine troops and he was able to return home safe. By this act of the government, the Americans were disappointed and the relationship of Philippines was affected as well. The American government points out that by doing such acts, the Philippines tolerated the act of “terrorists”.
The above mentioned cases tested our government and DFA as they decide over the protection of our nationals outside the country. The acts of our officials had a basis and it is our foreign policy. The results and consequences depend on the acts made by them. Our foreign policy then speaks a lot as its strength gives life to our nationals. Laws for our overseas Filipinos exist and must be implemented to protect the welfare of our nationals. After the Flor Contemplacion case, Migrant Workers Act of 1995 was made to protect our overseas Filipino workers. Its provisions focus on the process of deployment, illegal recruitment, services, government agencies, legal assistance for migrant worker affairs, the country-team approach, deregulation and phase out, professional and other highly skilled Filipinos and miscellaneous. Such laws guide our officials as they implement and strengthen policies to protect our nationals. If only, the above mentioned provisions are given enough attention and properly implemented, protecting our nationals outside the country would be easier.
In the deployment process, it is stated in Article 1 sec. 4 that “The State shall deploy overseas Filipino workers only in countries where the rights of Filipino migrant workers are protected.” This provision makes sense although it is vague. Although the Philippines has recognized countries that protect the rights of the Filipino, check and balance must be done after they have been deployed. Like what is happening in many countries now, Filipinos are being abused. So, is this still part of respecting their rights?
Fifteen years after the act was made, illegal recruitment stays a problem in the Philippines. Filipinos still entertain illegal recruitment even though it is known to be prohibited. Illegal recruitment is defined as “any act of canvassing, enlisting, contracting, transporting, utilizing, hiring, procuring workers and includes referring, contact services, promising or advertising for employment abroad, whether for profit or not, when undertaken by a non-license or non-holder of authority contemplated under Article 13(f) of Presidential Decree No. 442, as amended, otherwise known as the Labor Code of the Philippines.” Cases of illegal recruitment are obvious in the Philippines. Departments and Institutions are aware that such exist and it is their responsibility to combat any group that will try to violate the Philippine law. Although there are several cases in which the government was able to combat some, many still exist in every part of the country. If one citizen is illegally recruited, his or her documents are not filed in the records of the Department of Foreign Affairs therefore limiting the capacity of the department to protect the citizen. If a crime arises and a citizen does not have a file to become one of the bases, the government still is responsible in protecting them, not the illegal group that hired them. To avoid such incidents, the government should be keen in combating these illegal groups that put out citizens’ life into danger just to gain profit. They should be heavily penalized in able for them to learn and be an example for those who attempt to do illegal recruitment. Also, those entertaining illegal recruitment must be penalized. After all, if they will not entertain the crime, no one will offer it.
The labour code has reiterated the government agencies that will help in implementing the laws. First is the Department of Foreign Affairs which “shall take priority action its home office or foreign posts, shall take priority action or make representation with the foreign authority concerned to protect the rights of migrant workers and other overseas Filipinos and extend immediate assistance including the repatriation of distressed or beleaguered migrant workers and other overseas Filipinos” Next is the Department of Labour and employment which “shall see to it that labor and social welfare laws in the foreign countries are fairly applied to migrant workers and whenever applicable, to other overseas Filipinos including the grant of legal assistance and the referral to proper medical centers or hospitals” If these responsibilities are properly addressed to, the protection of Filipino nationals would be efficient.
One of the most important provisions in the labor code is the legal assistance for migrant workers affairs. It is “primarily responsible for the provision and overall coordination of all legal assistance services to be provided to Filipino migrant workers as well as overseas Filipinos in distress” This part of the provision makes our embassies responsible for the many cases of human rights violation and crimes to our Filipino workers. This counsel is the shoulder of our fellow Filipino in the different parts of the world.
The country-team approach states that “representatives and personnel of the Philippine government posted abroad regardless of their mother agencies shall, on a per country basis, act as one country-team with a mission under the leadership of the ambassador” In case of crimes and issues involving Filipino citizens in foreign countries, this rule shall take place. This provision makes it easier to protect our nationals.
Philippine Foreign Policy should be provided together with proper implementation. Outside the country, our Filipino nationals or citizens could only seek help and assistance in the embassies and consulates. Other than that, who will they run to in times of problem or abuse? One important consideration also is the process of migration. If violations are made even before one leaves the country, the possibility of human rights violation and abuse is widen. Illegal recruitment opens the door for abusive employers and it limits the capacity of our government to protect our nationals. After all, our nationals from outside the country remit money that boosts up our Philippine economy. For so long they have been the heroes of our country. As they migrate and work, they risk their lives. To protect them wherever they go is not just a responsibility but serves as a gratitude to them. Without them, our economy could have been dead now. Again, a government without its people is nothing. A government is made to and for the people, specifically in the Philippine set up as republic-democratic country. Protection of nationals is stated in the constitution of the Philippines therefore must be given utmost importance. Yes, the government has a great responsibility when it comes to its nationals. It is never an easy responsibility for every decision will have an effect not just inside the country but the globalize community outside. A lot of factors are to be considered before making a decision. Protection of nationals is vital but national and economic security matter as well.
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
1.) What is the mandate of the Department of Foreign Affairs in terms of being the principal arm to implement foreign policy? What other institutions help/assist the DFA in realising foreign policies?
It is the responsibility of the Department of Foreign Affairs to advise and assist the Presidetn when he/she plans, organizes, directs, coordinated and evaluates the enfite effort when it comes to foreign relations. The Philippine Foreign Service Act of 1991 states that the Department of Foreign Affairs should implement the three pillars of Philippine Foreign Policy which are the following:
- Preservation and enhancement of national security
- Promotion and attainment of economic security and;
- Protection of the rights and promotion of the welfare and interest of Filipinos overseas.
The DFA implements the said mandate with the help of the other institutions such as:
1. Department of National Defense (DND)under which are the Armed Forces of the Philippines(Philippine Army, Philippine Navy, Philippine Air Force, Philippine Marine Corps), the Office of Civil Defense and the National Disaster Coordinating Council
2. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)
3. National Economic Development Agency (NEDA)
4. Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA)
5. Commission on Filipino Overseas (CFO)
6. Overseas Workers Welfare Administration
7. Office of the Undersecretary for Migrant Workers Affairs (OUMWA)
8. National Reintegration Center for Overseas Filipino Workers (NRCO)
2.)Enumerate the eight foreign policy realities of former President Arroyo. For each reality, find 2-3 related news articles then make an analysis as to what extent did the Arroyo administration work to implement the said realities.
- China, Japan and U.S and their relationship will be a determining influence in the security situation and economic evolution of East Asia.
Article Link: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62605720100307
- Philippine Foreign Policy decisions have to be made in the context of ASEAN.
Article Link: http://www.apdip.net/news/phfossact
- The International Islamic Community will continue to be important for the Philippines.
Article Link: http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2006/71355.htm
- The coming years will see the growing importance of multilateral and inter-regional organizations to promote common interest.
Article Link: http://mail.pia.gov.ph/?m=12&sec=reader&rp=1&fi=p070613.htm&no=10&date=
- The defense of the nation's sovereignty and the protection of its environment and natural resources can be carried out only to the extent that it asserts its rights over the maritime territory and gets others to respect those rights
Article Link: http://www.inquirer.net/specialfeatures/spratlys/view.php?db=1&article=20080311-124157
- The country's economic policy will continue to be friendly to both domestic and foreign direct investments
Article Link: http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/business/02/16/10/foreign-investors-shunning-philippines-experts
- The Philippines can benefit most quickly from international tourism
Article Link: http://www.congress.gov.ph/download/cpbd/03-Tourism.pdf
- Overseas Filipinos will continue to be recognized for their critical role in the country's economic and social stability.
Article Link: http://aaronautics.wordpress.com/2009/06/01/the-plight-of-overseas-filipino-workers-and-the-government%E2%80%99s-role-as-manager-of-its-citizens%E2%80%99-affairs/
Analysis:
Having read different articles which are mostly made recently, if given a chance to rate the Arroyo Administration when it comes to the implementation of foreign policies, I would give her a 5 (10 as the highest). Yes, there are articles that praise the former president for having done her job as the "chief diplomat" of the country but unfortunately, most articles would say that the administration lacked effort in implementing the 8 realities. The 8 foreign policies would be great for the country only if it is properly given attention and is implemented. In the article under the investments (local and foreign), the writer concluded that there was a decrease in the foreign direct investments of the Philippines during PGMA's time, a strong manifestation that there were no strict implementations. I rated it as 5 because even though the Arroyo administration tried to have an effective foreign policy, there's a lot to improve especially in implementing the said policies. The administration for me, was not able to reach the expectations of its citizens when it comes to the foreign policies.
3.) With the assistance of different bureaus, institutions as well as interest groups, it is the president that drafts the state policies. What do you think will be included in PNOY's foreign policy list now that he has assumed the presidency? identify five issues and find news clippings (at least one for each issue) to support your answer.
As of PNOY's inaugural speech, he mentioned mostly internal problems. Fortunately, he was able to address the concerns of our overseas workers and migrants. He also made mention about our relationship with other countries. Those were the ones mentioned during his speech. He said that employment in the country will be one of his priorities.
4.) How significant is the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in the Philippines?
Considering that the Philippines is one of the founders of ASEAN and knowing that the country believes in regional cooperation, the ASEAN will mostly be one of the important considerations when plotting the foreign policy. As indicated also in one of the eight realities, Philippine Foreign Policy have to be made in the context of ASEAN.
It is the responsibility of the Department of Foreign Affairs to advise and assist the Presidetn when he/she plans, organizes, directs, coordinated and evaluates the enfite effort when it comes to foreign relations. The Philippine Foreign Service Act of 1991 states that the Department of Foreign Affairs should implement the three pillars of Philippine Foreign Policy which are the following:
- Preservation and enhancement of national security
- Promotion and attainment of economic security and;
- Protection of the rights and promotion of the welfare and interest of Filipinos overseas.
The DFA implements the said mandate with the help of the other institutions such as:
1. Department of National Defense (DND)under which are the Armed Forces of the Philippines(Philippine Army, Philippine Navy, Philippine Air Force, Philippine Marine Corps), the Office of Civil Defense and the National Disaster Coordinating Council
2. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)
3. National Economic Development Agency (NEDA)
4. Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA)
5. Commission on Filipino Overseas (CFO)
6. Overseas Workers Welfare Administration
7. Office of the Undersecretary for Migrant Workers Affairs (OUMWA)
8. National Reintegration Center for Overseas Filipino Workers (NRCO)
2.)Enumerate the eight foreign policy realities of former President Arroyo. For each reality, find 2-3 related news articles then make an analysis as to what extent did the Arroyo administration work to implement the said realities.
- China, Japan and U.S and their relationship will be a determining influence in the security situation and economic evolution of East Asia.
Article Link: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62605720100307
- Philippine Foreign Policy decisions have to be made in the context of ASEAN.
Article Link: http://www.apdip.net/news/phfossact
- The International Islamic Community will continue to be important for the Philippines.
Article Link: http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2006/71355.htm
- The coming years will see the growing importance of multilateral and inter-regional organizations to promote common interest.
Article Link: http://mail.pia.gov.ph/?m=12&sec=reader&rp=1&fi=p070613.htm&no=10&date=
- The defense of the nation's sovereignty and the protection of its environment and natural resources can be carried out only to the extent that it asserts its rights over the maritime territory and gets others to respect those rights
Article Link: http://www.inquirer.net/specialfeatures/spratlys/view.php?db=1&article=20080311-124157
- The country's economic policy will continue to be friendly to both domestic and foreign direct investments
Article Link: http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/business/02/16/10/foreign-investors-shunning-philippines-experts
- The Philippines can benefit most quickly from international tourism
Article Link: http://www.congress.gov.ph/download/cpbd/03-Tourism.pdf
- Overseas Filipinos will continue to be recognized for their critical role in the country's economic and social stability.
Article Link: http://aaronautics.wordpress.com/2009/06/01/the-plight-of-overseas-filipino-workers-and-the-government%E2%80%99s-role-as-manager-of-its-citizens%E2%80%99-affairs/
Analysis:
Having read different articles which are mostly made recently, if given a chance to rate the Arroyo Administration when it comes to the implementation of foreign policies, I would give her a 5 (10 as the highest). Yes, there are articles that praise the former president for having done her job as the "chief diplomat" of the country but unfortunately, most articles would say that the administration lacked effort in implementing the 8 realities. The 8 foreign policies would be great for the country only if it is properly given attention and is implemented. In the article under the investments (local and foreign), the writer concluded that there was a decrease in the foreign direct investments of the Philippines during PGMA's time, a strong manifestation that there were no strict implementations. I rated it as 5 because even though the Arroyo administration tried to have an effective foreign policy, there's a lot to improve especially in implementing the said policies. The administration for me, was not able to reach the expectations of its citizens when it comes to the foreign policies.
3.) With the assistance of different bureaus, institutions as well as interest groups, it is the president that drafts the state policies. What do you think will be included in PNOY's foreign policy list now that he has assumed the presidency? identify five issues and find news clippings (at least one for each issue) to support your answer.
As of PNOY's inaugural speech, he mentioned mostly internal problems. Fortunately, he was able to address the concerns of our overseas workers and migrants. He also made mention about our relationship with other countries. Those were the ones mentioned during his speech. He said that employment in the country will be one of his priorities.
4.) How significant is the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in the Philippines?
Considering that the Philippines is one of the founders of ASEAN and knowing that the country believes in regional cooperation, the ASEAN will mostly be one of the important considerations when plotting the foreign policy. As indicated also in one of the eight realities, Philippine Foreign Policy have to be made in the context of ASEAN.
Monday, July 5, 2010
Philippine Foreign Policy
Philippines.
Article Link: http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2006/71355.htm
- The coming years will see the growing importance of multilateral and inter-regional organizations to promote common interest.
Article Link: http://mail.pia.gov.ph/?m=12&sec=reader&rp=1&fi=p070613.htm&no=10&date=
- The defense of the nation's sovereignty and the protection of its environment and natural resources can be carried out only to the extent that it asserts its rights over the maritime territory and gets others to respect those rights
Article Link: http://www.inquirer.net/specialfeatures/spratlys/view.php?db=1&article=20080311-124157
- The country's economic policy will continue to be friendly to both domestic and foreign direct investments
Article Link: http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/business/02/16/10/foreign-investors-shunning-philippines-experts
- The Philippines can benefit most quickly from international tourism
Article Link: http://www.congress.gov.ph/download/cpbd/03-Tourism.pdf
- Overseas Filipinos will continue to be recognized for their critical role in the country's economic and social stability.
Article Link: http://aaronautics.wordpress.com/2009/06/01/the-plight-of-overseas-filipino-workers-and-the-government%E2%80%99s-role-as-manager-of-its-citizens%E2%80%99-affairs/
Analysis:
Having read different articles which are mostly made recently, if given a chance to rate the Arroyo Administration when it comes to the implementation of foreign policies, I would give her a 5 (10 as the highest). Yes, there are articles that praise the former president for having done her job as the "chief diplomat" of the country but unfortunately, most articles would say that the administration lacked effort in implementing the 8 realities. The 8 foreign policies would be great for the country only if it is properly given attention and is implemented. In the article under the investments (local and foreign), the writer concluded that there was a decrease in the foreign direct investments of the Philippines during PGMA's time, a strong manifestation that there were no strict implementations. I rated it as 5 because even though the Arroyo administration tried to have an effective foreign policy, there's a lot to improve especially in implementing the said policies. The administration for me, was not able to reach the expectations of its citizens when it comes to the foreign policies.
3.) With the assistance of different bureaus, institutions as well as interest groups, it is the president that drafts the state policies. What do you think will be included in PNOY's foreign policy list now that he has assumed the presidency? identify five issues and find news clippings (at least one for each issue) to support your answer.
As of PNOY's inaugural speech, he mentioned mostly internal problems. Fortunately, he was able to address the concerns of our overseas workers and migrants. He also made mention about our relationship with other countries. Those were the ones mentioned during his speech. He said that employment in the country will be one of his priorities.
Article Link: http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2006/71355.htm
- The coming years will see the growing importance of multilateral and inter-regional organizations to promote common interest.
Article Link: http://mail.pia.gov.ph/?m=12&sec=reader&rp=1&fi=p070613.htm&no=10&date=
- The defense of the nation's sovereignty and the protection of its environment and natural resources can be carried out only to the extent that it asserts its rights over the maritime territory and gets others to respect those rights
Article Link: http://www.inquirer.net/specialfeatures/spratlys/view.php?db=1&article=20080311-124157
- The country's economic policy will continue to be friendly to both domestic and foreign direct investments
Article Link: http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/business/02/16/10/foreign-investors-shunning-philippines-experts
- The Philippines can benefit most quickly from international tourism
Article Link: http://www.congress.gov.ph/download/cpbd/03-Tourism.pdf
- Overseas Filipinos will continue to be recognized for their critical role in the country's economic and social stability.
Article Link: http://aaronautics.wordpress.com/2009/06/01/the-plight-of-overseas-filipino-workers-and-the-government%E2%80%99s-role-as-manager-of-its-citizens%E2%80%99-affairs/
Analysis:
Having read different articles which are mostly made recently, if given a chance to rate the Arroyo Administration when it comes to the implementation of foreign policies, I would give her a 5 (10 as the highest). Yes, there are articles that praise the former president for having done her job as the "chief diplomat" of the country but unfortunately, most articles would say that the administration lacked effort in implementing the 8 realities. The 8 foreign policies would be great for the country only if it is properly given attention and is implemented. In the article under the investments (local and foreign), the writer concluded that there was a decrease in the foreign direct investments of the Philippines during PGMA's time, a strong manifestation that there were no strict implementations. I rated it as 5 because even though the Arroyo administration tried to have an effective foreign policy, there's a lot to improve especially in implementing the said policies. The administration for me, was not able to reach the expectations of its citizens when it comes to the foreign policies.
3.) With the assistance of different bureaus, institutions as well as interest groups, it is the president that drafts the state policies. What do you think will be included in PNOY's foreign policy list now that he has assumed the presidency? identify five issues and find news clippings (at least one for each issue) to support your answer.
As of PNOY's inaugural speech, he mentioned mostly internal problems. Fortunately, he was able to address the concerns of our overseas workers and migrants. He also made mention about our relationship with other countries. Those were the ones mentioned during his speech. He said that employment in the country will be one of his priorities.
Sunday, July 4, 2010
Philippines: History and The State
It’s just so funny how we opened the class discussion. We were asked about the 3 elements of foreign policy and it took us so long before we actually answered it. National Security, economic Progress and Protection of Nationals: facts that were mentioned two meetings ago. And what? We have forgotten it? Not anymore, after this meeting, I know these three already by heart.
Our handout for the session is about history. True enough, reading the Philippine history is something that you’ll think as boring and never ending. Ever since grade school, history has been part of the curriculum. When will it end then? Taking this course (AB-CDA) and having the last lecture in phifocy made me say and realize that “Oh, this is never ending and I will never ever get rid of it”.
I am part of the Philippine history and I would want to believe that there’s a need to study such and be able to know the strengths and weaknesses of the country, from the government to its people. Reading the handouts made me discover and remember our history especially how we were able to gain independence. I’ve read this story many times but never memorized it. I just know that we were conquered by the Spanish then the Americans and then the Japanese but anything beyond done is uncertain for me. But as of the last session in phifocy, I learned a deeper and greater view of the colonization and the different administration of the Philippines. My favourite part of the discussion was that of the Martial Law. I have been so jealous that I wasn’t able to experience it. Some says it is best during that time but some says freedom was lost when martial law was declared. Whatever people say then, this era had its own strengths and weaknesses. After the discussion about the Philippine history, we talked about the state, the constitution. I’ve gone through poligov so I can say that I’ve read most of the parts of the constitution. Well, I actually have a book, a thick book but remembering our poligov class, our Philippine Constitution is so long and some of the words used are very complicated. I am even thinking if an ordinary citizen who wasn’t able to study will be able to understand what our constitution is stating. I hope my question/realization makes sense.
We ended the session with the discussion of the Philippines’ political economy wherein there are 2 key variables: The strong elite families and a weak state. We just had a new elected president in our country and I am hoping that through his leadership, we see the change that majority of us Filipinos have been looking for.
Our handout for the session is about history. True enough, reading the Philippine history is something that you’ll think as boring and never ending. Ever since grade school, history has been part of the curriculum. When will it end then? Taking this course (AB-CDA) and having the last lecture in phifocy made me say and realize that “Oh, this is never ending and I will never ever get rid of it”.
I am part of the Philippine history and I would want to believe that there’s a need to study such and be able to know the strengths and weaknesses of the country, from the government to its people. Reading the handouts made me discover and remember our history especially how we were able to gain independence. I’ve read this story many times but never memorized it. I just know that we were conquered by the Spanish then the Americans and then the Japanese but anything beyond done is uncertain for me. But as of the last session in phifocy, I learned a deeper and greater view of the colonization and the different administration of the Philippines. My favourite part of the discussion was that of the Martial Law. I have been so jealous that I wasn’t able to experience it. Some says it is best during that time but some says freedom was lost when martial law was declared. Whatever people say then, this era had its own strengths and weaknesses. After the discussion about the Philippine history, we talked about the state, the constitution. I’ve gone through poligov so I can say that I’ve read most of the parts of the constitution. Well, I actually have a book, a thick book but remembering our poligov class, our Philippine Constitution is so long and some of the words used are very complicated. I am even thinking if an ordinary citizen who wasn’t able to study will be able to understand what our constitution is stating. I hope my question/realization makes sense.
We ended the session with the discussion of the Philippines’ political economy wherein there are 2 key variables: The strong elite families and a weak state. We just had a new elected president in our country and I am hoping that through his leadership, we see the change that majority of us Filipinos have been looking for.
Sunday, June 20, 2010
One World, Rival Thoeries || One world, Many theories
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Saturday, June 12, 2010
My expectations in PHIFOCY :)
"Philippine Foreign Policy" What's it about? How important is this subject? Why is it considered a major in my course?
Those are some of my questions when I enrolled this subject. For the past 6 terms I've been through the ups and downs of my major subjects, I expect this subject to be complicated at first. Maybe because of the complexity of the issues regarding foreign policies. Although I have an idea on what it's about because of the major subjects previously taken, i expect that my understanding about these foreign policies be deepened and my confusions be clarified as well. I also expect to discover realities in the international arena.
I expect that this subject will be tackling serious matters and issues but i still expect the weekly meetings to be fun and memorable. I would like to enjoy taking this subject :)
Those are some of my questions when I enrolled this subject. For the past 6 terms I've been through the ups and downs of my major subjects, I expect this subject to be complicated at first. Maybe because of the complexity of the issues regarding foreign policies. Although I have an idea on what it's about because of the major subjects previously taken, i expect that my understanding about these foreign policies be deepened and my confusions be clarified as well. I also expect to discover realities in the international arena.
I expect that this subject will be tackling serious matters and issues but i still expect the weekly meetings to be fun and memorable. I would like to enjoy taking this subject :)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)